I don't think I commented on MMC's operating outside federal drugs laws, I'm not sure why you're using the 16 patient count rule. All marijuana is illegal federally, so I'm not sure what you are trying to say with the 99plant max and MMC's only operating 16 patients.

I'm still not sure what your points are, we can't seem to get past you being insulted at me.

I don't really care.

If you consider the term 'caregiver' to include people currently non-compliant with state law, then we can't agree on much more. I would argue that your definition of caregiver needs to be updated with this new legislation. I'm just trying to be precise, you're acting like a child by insisting that all people who grow pot are automatically NOT ALLOWED to be bad people, such as someone who operates a meth lab.

I consider you to be a caregiver. If Bartkowicz got busted tomorrow, I wouldn't call him a caregiver, and I would caution you doing the same, due to all of the negativity surrounding this in Colorado right now. Do you also consider Bartkowicz to be a caregiver if he was busted tomorrow?

I'm just asking for us to be precise. Your assumptions and interpretations of what caregiver means are preventing you from getting passed that and having a simple conversation.

You're still pissed that I compared caregivers to meth labs. I still haven't seen you address anything related to these two examples. Now that I've spent 100 posts getting this example, would you mind answering it? You seem so enraged by the subject of the original post, I tried to tweak it to get the answer I was looking for, and you're still talking about my original comment and the exact words that I used.

We're passed the fact that we don't see eye to eye on what the word 'caregiver' means. I'm trying to get to how authorities will enforce this new legislation, etc. I'm not personally attacking you. I question that you comprehend my posts. That's not an insult. I could easily be doing it wrong, so don't be offended. That's why I have tried to give a few different examples, but it seems we're still on the original complaint, which is your assumption that I compared legal to illegal.

I am interested in comparing illegal to illegal. Do you understand? That's why these stupid posts get deleted.

I am asking and looking to have a discussion about a very specific thing. If you think I am trolling, I am trying to generate discussion about a topic that is important to me and others here, I assume.

For example, if you had simply got over your initial rage of thinking I called you growers meth heads, or something, and just posted your opinion, then I could have what I want, which is a lighthearted discussion or debate on current social policies. I'm bored at work. Instead, I try to have a discussion, you post what a moron I am for comparing 'meth lab operators' to caregivers. I always tried to set this example using a situation where two places got busted, presumably by the dea. A meth lab, and a guy growing 99+ plants. Both illegal in the eyes of state and federal drug laws.

Get it?

Here is the simple question: Would those two examples be treated the same, differently? Why?

I just used an example without the term caregiver, can I get an answer from you now?