Hey Bigsby, Gallup Poll Caught Lying

[Islandborn]

Gallup is COMBINING two seperate sampling methods and combining them into one so-called trend of registered voters (Complete with captioned graph), getting different results, but pretending they show one trend all the same. LOL.

Here is Gallup on June 2nd 2010
Republicans Move Ahead in Generic Ballot for Congress

But now on July 19th....mysteriously the Dems have a lead, despite the pretty graphs now titled " Candidate Preferences in 2010 mid-terms among registered voters."

Catch the difference???? Repubs lead with a sample of registered voters....but dems lead with a sample of adults??

RealClearPolitics caught it
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Generic Congressional Vote

How terribly DISHONEST of Gallup to string together TWO DIFFERENT POLLS as One series as Gallup not only does in their graphs, but in their write ups as well.

Nice try though.....someone at Gallup tried to pull a fast one. The Dems are DOOMED in November no matter the media. Glad this made ur stomach stop hurting for a couple hours though:thumbsup:

That was easy.

Islandborn Reviewed by Islandborn on 07-21-2010. Hey Bigsby, Gallup Poll Caught Lying Gallup is COMBINING two seperate sampling methods and combining them into one so-called trend of registered voters (Complete with captioned graph), getting different results, but pretending they show one trend all the same. LOL. Here is Gallup on June 2nd 2010 Republicans Move Ahead in Generic Ballot for Congress But now on July 19th....mysteriously the Dems have a lead, despite the pretty graphs now titled " Candidate Preferences in 2010 mid-terms among registered voters." Catch Rating: 5

[Islandborn]

As you have personally stated.....since your a member of the elite top 5% and worked for someone who paid you to "take pictures" all over the middle east which means ya went to school.....how did ya miss these numbers inside this poll?

I understand you are desperatly searching for anything good coming from this socialist administration but good luck......the long,long, history of socialisms failures around the globe are so big only an intellectual or a rich elitist could ignore them.

You pay more taxes......I'll find ways to skate around em. Thats the new Job for the rich folks.....give half of everything you own to the poor. Including your home and computer and camera.:thumbsup:

[jtsik330]

Hypothetical question: would you sacrifice let's just say 5 percent of your income to put a stop to US kids from being hungry in the US? Would you do it? Oooorrrrrr should they starv and stop looking for handouts? Not saying that this is what taxes are going to or anything I just wanna know your personal standpoint on that question.

[Islandborn]

Fair question.......I would be willing to give maybe .5% of my familys income to stop children from being hungry in America.....I have my own two, hungry ass lil munchkins to feed first and foremost. My family isn't rich and doesn't come from money....my mexican immigrants wife doesnt come from money either. We make FAR less than 250,000$ dollars between us. However we are fiscal conservatives and smart with our $$ and properties. NO DEBT besides mortgage which is so low its not even funny. 2200 sq ft 2006 Lennar and I bet our mortgage is cheaper than most peoples rent. I truly cant imagine the suckers who sign their names to adjustable rate mortgages.

[bigsby]

I figured Islandboy would understand this method, given you history of combining comments from two different threads in an effort to deceive readers here.

Let's see you do that spinning thing you're so good at. Look everyone, Islandboy is spinning like a top!

Yeah that's right. I make this kind of $$$ taking pictures and writing stories for The Nation. Hahahahaha.

I carry debt. Quite a bit of it. That said, I have already paid off one mortgage, undergrad loans (early), I'm on track to pay of the grad school loans early, and I'm out in front on my primary house loan too. There is nothing wrong with debt if managed properly. I couldn't get by without it.

As I said previously, I would accept higher taxes to pay for just about anything except more military expenditure. No sense throwing good money after bad on that one. Plus the amounts of money going into military expenditures is just obscene.

I do hope the President has the good sense to let the Bush tax cuts sunset, at least of people making more than 250K, unless the republicans can come up with a way to pay for it that is... oh wait. No need to offset tax cuts for the wealthy. Never mind.

[Islandborn]

spinning? You mean Gallup is combining two seperate polling techs and presenting as one correct? Your Gallup Poll is BUNK and Busted. Spam Thread.

You tried this lame argument a week or so ago.....NOBODY sliced your sentence dude, and I INVITE the mods to see if thats true. So sorry. It just didnt happen.

[bigsby]

The mods don't have time for your pissant whining. You know what you did. So does everyone here. It's part of your record. I suggest you just move on and hope we all forget. That is part of your political outlook anyway. So just apply it to yourself.