Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
I don't care, but moderators delete posts that contain personal attacks. I'm not offended at you calling me ignorant, but a mod might.

Regarding your post, I think it's relevant to post where you stand, instead of calling me names.

How are non-compliant home grows any different than meth labs, in the eyes of the law?

Are you a non-compliant grower? Are you pissed that 1284 now puts you on the level as a meth lab?

edit: I am purposely playing devil's advocate, and I certainly don't agree that growers are on an even scale with meth labs.

Does anyone who disagrees care to take a position that non-compliant caregivers are now just as illegal as meth labs? Anyone? Or is everyone just going to tell me I'm stupid without adding anything to the discussion?
Actually now you are spinning what you said... You said...
Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
Plus, aren't 'commercial growers' assumed to be compliant with state law, while 'growers' can be assumed to be breaking the law, and nothing more than drug traffickers, no better than someone operating a meth lab?
Is it not true that commercial growers have to follow the same rules as far as counts other than the 5 patient rule? Why would you automatically assume that they are compliant and that a caregiver/grower is not?? What if the center has more plants than they are supposed to?

To answer your questions about me..
I'm fully compliant.
I don't feel that leo will treat non compliant caregivers any different than non compliant dispensaries. I also don't feel they will treat either anywhere near to how they would treat a meth lab. I feel that was just a rediculous assumption by you to try to make caregiver/growers look like the bad guy.

Do you think for a second that they are not going to be visiting registered caregivers houses?