Quote Originally Posted by SprngsCaregiver
Actually now you are spinning what you said... You said...

Is it not true that commercial growers have to follow the same rules as far as counts other than the 5 patient rule? Why would you automatically assume that they are compliant and that a caregiver/grower is not?? What if the center has more plants than they are supposed to?

To answer your questions about me..
I'm fully compliant.
I don't feel that leo will treat non compliant caregivers any different than non compliant dispensaries. I also don't feel they will treat either anywhere near to how they would treat a meth lab. I feel that was just a rediculous assumption by you to try to make caregiver/growers look like the bad guy.

Do you think for a second that they are not going to be visiting registered caregivers houses?
Thank you for taking the time to post intelligently.

First, I am just playing devil's advocate, and I am only referring to large scale home grows that are now out of compliance with state law and therefore illegal. Again, I am thinking of an example like the guy in highlands ranch, not a small scale caregiver.

I am assuming that any MMC still open is compliant with vertical integration, licensing fees et cetera. I don't have a problem with some sort of enforcement of those laws, but I have a problem with cameras, auditors, etc.

For the purposes of this discussion, I am referring only to large scale grows, people who didn't marry up to an MMC. Let's assume a hundred plants? I don't even know what would be considered a large scale grow like that. I'm referring about caregivers who might have been totally compliant who just had lots of patients so they can have large grows. Those are the people who are against 1284. The people who want to grow but not pay the fees, licenses etc.