Quote Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
With appropriate respect, I don't think you know very much about what freedoms we enjoy, or their source. Signage is not a natural rights issue and has little or nothing to do with the Constitution. To frame the issue as a contest between "God given rights" vs the tightening grip of government is hyperbole. To characterize the ability to put a pot leaf on a sign as a natural right is to display confusion about what rights are, where they come from, and how our laws treat them. Signage is and has always been the prerogative of local government, duly elected by the people.
LOL Heard of freedom of speech or freedom of press? Amendment 1 of the Constitution.

Why do you think pharmaceutical companies can put antidepressant and viagra ads everywhere? Or protestors can put whatever they want on signs?