Quote Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
na they're basically not. That's a poor analogy.

There simply has to be a state agency to issue the cards and establish the procedures for issuing said cards, and set the fees needed to pay for the program, as well as maintain the registry. This is what we voted for, and it's a good thing.
Actually it's not, you just put a different spin on that analogy High. Yes they do the things you said and yes I agree that they're more of a good than bad thing. BUT

For example....
Creating new registry forms and requiring almost immediate compliance from patients to not be rejected by the registry (even if they had a previous rec on previous paperwork) while still allowing themselves a projected year to catch up and be in compliance with their own procedures they set forth...maybe you're right...that seems pretty fair and square. Like checks expiring and patients being rejected because of their inadequacy. A good thing. lol


my ball my rules. Get the right forms, get workin' on that 70% and we'll figure the rest along the way! -CDPHE