Quote Originally Posted by justpics
james has found some case law that says that contracts made by health clinics which are not owned and operated by health care professionals, but have as employees, health care professionals, are not enforceable under the law.


He interprets that to mean that a business who hires an independent contractor who is a health care professional will be writing recommendations that are not legal and would not offer protection under 69.51A.

But the only person who seems to think this is him, and AFAIK not a single district attorney in WA (the guys who actually decide what gets charged) accepts this interpretation.





Gypski;

hypothetical case law, that may or may not offer clarification on this is really not worth mentioning. The cases regarding patients of THCF that have been found guilty AFAIK have had nothing to do with what james is claiming, and that the authorizations were found to not be valid for other reasons.
ok. thank you for the explanation. I figure if i have my card stay low key and follow the laws that i undertsand/pertain to me:thumbsup:, i should be fine.