Quote Originally Posted by justpics
There are a lot of things in the law that are not clear, that's for certain. But considering the 10s of thousands of patients with "doc in the box" authorizations. All of which the local DA's recognize as legit insofar as the authorizing agent being able to authorize is concerned, tells me that the concern james raises isn't one worth spending too much time worrying about until there is something clear from the courts saying those authorizations are in fact not legit.


Considering WA's history, I'd say the burden is over there.
Think outside the box for a second here..how did a assault case get into our medical marijuana analysis from the court of appeals and the supreme court in State v. Fry?????????

Look at the legal briefs in State v. Hanson in which it originated from...LegalJoint: Washington Lawyers: Stiley and Cikutovich, Criminal Defense, Medical Marijuana Law

Oh, the same court in which my son suggested they use.lol...talk about a set up for our cases in the future..which are here and now...2010!!

Watch and learn grasshopper.

p.s. did you remind them of the "recent" wa. supreme court ruling about learned professions and corp. practice of medicine...prolly not huh.