Quote Originally Posted by justpics
Gypski;

hypothetical case law, that may or may not offer clarification on this is really not worth mentioning. The cases regarding patients of THCF that have been found guilty AFAIK have had nothing to do with what james is claiming, and that the authorizations were found to not be valid for other reasons.
If any law is full of hypotheticals is RCW 69.51a and all it arbitrary conflicting language and numerous different opinions in the lower courts on up to the Supreme Court. Its a minefield or gauntlet for a patient to run through even though they believe they are legal under that statute.:wtf: