YET, the judge in my specific case disagreed with the state and agreed with me, NOTHING MENTIONED IN THE WHOLE CHAPTER ABOUT 1 YR. EXPIRATION MANDATED DATES INVALIDATES AN AUTHORIZATION ALREADY SIGNED(DATE OR NOT EXPIRING IT.)and went into statutory construction and opined(without facts & conclusions) that since I had 2 authorizations for differant conditions for the same drug, my 2004 was superseded by the "limited" 1 yr. authorization by reason of it being for the same drug "only"...then opined that the court doesn't understand if a dr. is able to authorize a specific treatment why the same dr. can't limit, change the course or eliminate said treatment to be in compliance with the statue's intent...the professional opinion of the dr..

Well, he is correct in the sense of across the board without a case by case examination of the facts to the laws..

For example, if your treatment of using mmj worsens your condition, then well, he is on point...

But, if your condition relies on your use to live or be without chronic pain, say like with any condition in section (a)...then he is completely wrong, cause that would cause harm and put the dr. at jeopardy for being outside the standards of care... some conditions require a dr. to mitigate the symptoms with because there is nothing else available to them because of the "COMPLEXITY" of the condition(s)...and can't be changed due to life or slow death which is cruel and unusual...

Oh, I forgot..my dr. wasn't the one who claimed I was guilty, nor did the state claim I provided fraudulent documents..or altered..as a matter of fact..I asked those specific questions...because that's what the legislature proscribed as to my conduct...
jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on . Why there can't be a 1yr. expiration date in Wa. St. The State of Washington, Appellant, v. Larry H. Enloe, Respondent No. 7468-4-III COURT OF APPEALS OF WASHINGTON, Division Three, Panel Four 47 Wn. App. 165; 734 P.2d 520; 1987 Wash. App. LEXIS 3342 March 12, 1987 Rating: 5