Quote Originally Posted by gypski
So, bottom line, because a patient doesn't pay a yearly fee, that non payment does not and cannot invalidate their doctor's signed authorization. Or is the authorization invalidated because under the law, doc in the boxes aren't legal?

Or, because it was signed by a doctor licensed to practice medicine, regardless of how a patient gets to them, the authorization is valid, then doctor cannot be charged for dishonest services because his corporate entity was the original violator of the law? Ignorance of the law is no excuse, but I cannot see how a court could reasonably invalidate an authorization under these parameters since an initial fee was paid believing it was valid with no expiration date in compliance with RCW 69.51a and signed by a licensed doctor. :wtf:

Many inquiring minds need to know? I-1068 would undo all these legal gymnastics.
READ PEOPLE V. WINDUS IN THE LEGAL SECTION HERE!!! SAME LEGAL THEORY APPLIES HERE IN WA. ST.

ALSO IF YOU GOT UR AUTHORIZATION FROM A DOC-IN-THE-BOX, YOU DIDN'T SEE A M.D. FOR UR AUTHORIZATION...YOU FIRST HAD TO SEE A LAYMEN BUSINESS OWNER(THEIR ADMIN. PROCESS, I.E. PAY-TO-PLAY) BEFORE YOU COULD GET TO SEE ANY DR....

Also read the the statutes about "LEARNED PROFESSIONS" and "WHO" may practice any healthcare in wa...ONLY LICENSED PROFESSIONALS MAY START OR OWN(SHAREHOLDER) ANY HEALTHCARE BUSINESS...NOT LAYPERSONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You have an authorization from a clinic which can't sell anyone any health services at all in wa....

We will work on this issue my friend but, you must understand the rules of engagement first.!!! THE LEGAL ONES...LOL.

p.s.,MY LONG TIME FRIEND "SHOTWELL" IS RUNNING FOR SHERIFF IN OUR COUNTY..got to love it...he almost won last time...hee hee hee.