Why there can't be a 1yr. expiration date in Wa. St.

[jamessr]

I really don't get why you keep calling me john...


anyway;

" (a) Is a patient of a physician licensed under chapter 18.71 or 18.57 RCW;

(b) Has been diagnosed by THAT physician as having a terminal or debilitating medical condition;"


that's the basis in law for what I am saying, its RCW69.51A.010 (a), (b)

Sorry about the john...is just my way of saying shitty..my bad.

You are focusing on just one small area of law, which don't even apply to a doc-in-the-box when fettered out...

YOU ARE A PATIENT OF THE CLINIC, NOT THE health care practitioner, regardless of who signed....this is obviously were your analysis goes out the window. The physician who made the diagnosis is not the doc-in-the-box doctor but, the diagnosing physician in your prior medical records they look at...i.e. PERTINENT MEDICAL RECORDS WHICH SHOWS THAT OTHER TREATMENTS AND MEDS HAVE BEEN ABSOLUTELY USELESS.

I have 3 letters from the WA. DOH which clearly states that if I had been seen in wa. st. and made the same complaint about THCF and their doctors, they would take action and shut them down immediately....so if ya feel lucky, write a complaint to the DOH and see what they respond with..lol.