Quote Originally Posted by Nullific
The claim that marijuana today is more potent than 30 years ago is false in the first place. Even if it were true all that would mean is that you don't need to smoke as much to get high. They have been using this 'more potent' bullshit since the 1980s, here we are 20 years later and people are still smoking mids and brickweed.
http://www.mapinc.org/newsnc/v05/n475/a07.html
http://www.reason.com/sullum/081304.shtml
LoL. I read both those sites and neither still made any sense. They are just stating the fact that there wasn't a HUGE degree in change of potency as claimed by the media, but there was a "modest rise". You can't argue with the fact that the science behind breeding and the genetics of marijuana hasn't evolved since nearly thirty years ago, that's just rediculous. Sure people were experimenting with genetics of mj 30+ years ago, but you sure as hell didn't see the super breeds you do today. Honestly, you gotta be in self-denial to believe that shit...BTW, it doesn't have anything with the addiction which I was getting at in the first place.