Quote Originally Posted by jamessr
Interesting weez how you can just out your butt say I am using "my" interpretations of the law...no wonder why you don't practice law anymore...you go way out on branches you don't belong and you get broke off..

I have not once posted "any" caselaw used in my case by me the defendant..or my lawyer..all I am posting is the state and the court sua sponte caselaw they both used ....used to convict me....!!

Get a life!!

At least someone is looking out for us patients "INTERESTS" in our state...and the only people being hurt is us patients listening to lawyers who feed on us patients for their own interests...look at all the shit caselaw here in wa. against us patients...if you had any balls at all mr. lawyer man..you would be helping instead of telling people here I am hurting them...

When I am done...we won't need lawyers...keep in mind weez, I ain't no rookie like you seem to think...nor am I a greenhorn...I have won every case I have ever fought but 1. And they have all been "TESTED" in court and succeeded...remember this is my 3rd MMJ case here in wa....

When the ruling comes down on my appeal...you will shit yourself!!! watch and learn, you may actually learn something from a non-lawyer.lol.
Actually I explained to you a few months back when we encountered each other for the first time that I don't practice law right now because I am ill, and I do not feel that I would be able to give 100% to clients. You may be surprised, but not all attorneys (in fact not even a simple majority) practice law solely for the money.

I am not sure why you say the things that you do, but whatever the reason is, you're clearly a very angry man. That is not a very good trait when talking about law. In fact it is almost as bad as blanket cites, the wholesale cut and paste of case law that you engage in. You continue to make arguments that are only tangentially related to case law that you cite, you cite inapplicable and possibly outdated cases and there have been several times when you've been just plain incorrect as to the meaning of a decision. That is why I pointed out that it would be helpful to others if you stated exactly what your education and legal status are. Then people can make their own informed decisions on how much credence should be given to your assertions.

All my best, and I hope you do win your appeal. If you do, I will certainly do what I can to learn from the case.

I believe that we both have said all that we had to say on the subject, so good luck in your future endeavors.


P.S. "sua sponte" means "of its own accord", the English cognate is "spontaneous" ... "sua sponte case law" does not make sense.