Or the original ballot measure wasn't considering that the state would want some of the action ie revenue like all the other MMJ states.It's time to point the finger of injustice at the author that composed the measure and not the courts or the government.The government could be getting revenue by a 5 prong approach.
1.Yearly fee for MMJ card issued by the state.
2.Personal growers permit.
3.Dispensary Yearly Permit.
4.Sales Tax when purchasing from Dispensary
5.Dispensary workers income tax.
That's alot of money for Chrissy and Friends.
Got it?
Washedout Reviewed by Washedout on . Why did the Wa. St. Supreme court "use" 3 different defenses in State v. Fry? So I have been dissecting State v. Fry our Wa. Supreme court ruled on...I am finding our court here is smoking controlled substances themselves, way worse than "MARIJUANA/CANNABIS"...they have "used" 3 different defenses claiming they are the same defense...statutory-affirmative- and "COMPASSIONATE USE"... O.K., looking these "definitions" up separately are completely different from one another...talk about corruption TO WATCH THE BANK...geez people, can you use your law degrees in a more Rating: 5