Quote Originally Posted by CovertCarpenter
...and should be cause for removal, though that is a looong hard row to hoe.

I would definitely argue for a new hearing / retrial / act two... this utterly sux.

I wonder if the judge involved would have the temerety to visit the person in question, and watch them before and after their medicine usage, to see how non-'loaded' the person actually is. If they are a regular smoker, they're probably accustomed to it, and not 'stoned/loaded'.

The state needs less power.
Just the commission hearing or receiving such a case is enough for other judges to get the picture..removal isn't necessary for others to smell the fuse burning....judges talk amongst other CLOSED "CLUB" MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME CT. DBA THE STATE OF WA.

I have filed a few myself...and gotten good responses from the judges I filed them on...even though the commission dismissed them...it was the fear they felt with the unknown which they understood.