DEATON v. LAWSON, 40 Wash. 486; 82 P. 879; 1905 Wash

[jamessr]

Does this mean that if Doc in the Boxes are found to not be legit, does this mean all those who got authorizations from them can sue for a refund?

means the wa. ag get's to collect for us under the public interest doctrine. CPA AND ANTI-REBATE LAW.

OR SUE THE AG FOR BEING A DIPSHIT.

jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on 06-18-2010. DEATON v. LAWSON, 40 Wash. 486; 82 P. 879; 1905 Wash CALVIN C. DEATON, Respondent v. O. V. LAWSON et al., Appellants No. 5845 Supreme Court of Washington 40 Wash. 486; 82 P. 879; 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1012 November 14, 1905, Decided Rating: 5