Results 1 to 10 of 24
Hybrid View
-
06-09-2010, 07:05 PM #1
Senior Member
Matt Cook from Dept of Revenue on 1284
*stirring the pot*
Originally Posted by TheReleafCenter
You expect growers to pay the OPCL fees even though the licenses will be in your name? As employer and licensee, that responsibility is yours. Say you go out of business a week after signing up five growers who each put up $500 for your OPCL licenses. Those growers are now out their cash and without legal protection, and must then begin negotiations anew with another MMC who might also charge them for OPCL fees. You should pay those fees, not them.HighPopalorum Reviewed by HighPopalorum on . Matt Cook from Dept of Revenue on 1284 The obvious highlight of tonight's panel discussion was Matt Cook, who finally released some hard numbers regarding licensing fees and compliance dates. July 1st: Have approval from your local government for whatever license you want. For centers, this means complying with existing local regulations. For commercial growers, this means being properly zoned and having either a plant husbandry permit(maybe license?) or nursery facility. The difference is mostly semantic between Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Don't know if you all have seen this? Matt Cook is stepping down.
By AllenScott in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 1Last Post: 06-22-2011, 05:52 AM -
MMJ activists want revenue dept. to re-open MMJ committee to public
By TurboALLWD in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 1Last Post: 08-07-2010, 08:18 AM -
Matt Brown HB 10-1284 Video
By MMDInsuranceCo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 3Last Post: 07-13-2010, 06:53 PM -
Exclusive video Matt Cook Dept of Revenue discussing HB 10-1284
By MMDInsuranceCo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 16Last Post: 06-13-2010, 09:06 PM -
Matt Cook from Department of Revenue mtg on HB 1284
By MMDInsuranceCo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 4Last Post: 06-07-2010, 01:14 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online