Quote Originally Posted by Zedleppelin
A. We are talking about patients.

B. 1284 cannot trump a constitutional amendment.
It seems like you are taking the viewpoint that you somehow can't get in trouble if you are A20 compliant but not 1284/109 compliant.

Would you please clarify? Are you saying if I have 100 patients as a caregiver, legal under amendment 20 and illegal under 1284/109 that I can't get in trouble?

Or are you still referring to the affirmative defense if arrested? I think it's important to note whether you are saying to ignore 1284, or that in court, it won't hold up.

I guess I might be naive, but if I am not compliant with 1284/109, then I could get arrested or otherwise get in trouble. Are you saying that's not true? Are you saying that 1284/109 don't have any legal authority, no teeth? It kind of seems that instead of the dept. of health overseeing things (joke), now that the dept. of revenue will handle enforcement will not be a joke with enforcement.

Thoughts?