Quote Originally Posted by copobo
teach me then, who are the Republicans that are pro-mmj in the legislature?

I know some tried anything to avoid 1284 b/c they don't want it legit.

1284 was definitely a mistake that was started by Romer, a democrat, but 109 which violates the doctor patient relationship was sponsored by an R. Kind of surprising, but true.

As I stated, this is NOT about party for me. If you can show me a true mmj republican running for legislature, I'll have my $200 check in the mail for their candidacy.

Let's NOT make this about party. It's all about who is for MMJ.

I'm an Independent, btw
Again--this is a RED STATE. You do not live in California or New York city. You live in Colorado--and most Coloradoans are FISCALLY conservative people. They could give a rats ass about other social issues--such as gay marriage--they are mainly pro-life people--whom do not believe abortion is right--and you're lucky to be living in this state-because as a 3rd generation native--we do not like federal government intervention into our personal lives.

Now for those that are NEW to this state--I am certain that our ways comes as a SURPRISE to you. We are not LIBERALS. If you want to go to a blue-state--Liberal mmj state-then go-New Jersey-the number one blue most liberal--democrat lead states in this country to do your business. But I would suggest that you look up their marijuana laws before you start packing your bags--

IOW--Welcome to Colorado
rightwinger Reviewed by rightwinger on . Candidates we support I'd like to start thinking about candidates for office that have shown (and voted) in favor of the mmj patient and small caregiver & dispensaries. In general, in my opinion, favoring/voting for 1284 would be an obvious dis-qualifier. I don't think party affiliation should be a consideration - just the candidates stance and history on mmj / legalization. We do hope for converts, so some consideration could be given to recent and outright good behavior. what do you think? Rating: 5