Quote Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
I think Stan Garnett is a good candidate, even though he favors regulation and his opponent lobbied hard against H.B. 1284. Ditto Hickenlooper over McInnis. I'll most definitely be voting for Bennett over Norton/Buck, even though Bennett has no position at all on MJ and leaves me cold.

Bennet--you've got to be joking right? This guy is the take everything you've got.

Yes a big SPENDING democrat--but has absolutely no history on voting on MMJ--and guaranteed will be a HUGE TAX DUDE, and would gladly vote to send this project to Kentucky to tobacco producers there--DA--DUH--DA--DUH.

Republicans are the answer--at least they believe in "free enterprise" they believe in the SMALL business--and not a freakin take-over of every industry in this country. Republicans believe in keeping JOBS here in Colorado.

Regarding mmj--it's not political parties--it's who is a believer versus who doesn't believe in the benefit of medical marjuana.

And if you haven't figured that out yet--DON'T VOTE.
rightwinger Reviewed by rightwinger on . Candidates we support I'd like to start thinking about candidates for office that have shown (and voted) in favor of the mmj patient and small caregiver & dispensaries. In general, in my opinion, favoring/voting for 1284 would be an obvious dis-qualifier. I don't think party affiliation should be a consideration - just the candidates stance and history on mmj / legalization. We do hope for converts, so some consideration could be given to recent and outright good behavior. what do you think? Rating: 5