Just another of my opinions on this subject. If I-1068 doesn't get on the ballot because enough signatures haven't been collected, one should look no further then the initiative not being dreamed up or written long before January's announcement. It won't be the fault of those volunteers who gave it their best. But it will also be the failure of the judicial/executive branches and its participants to come to the reasonable and honest conclusion, based upon scientific evidence and not legalistic verbosity and gymnastics with the twisting of facts and truths based on racism, pseudoscience, and just plain voodoo biases that cannabis is, in and of itself, a harmless plant and herbal remedy.

And should it not get on the ballot, any attorney who does not take a medical cannabis defense pro bono nothing but another parasite feeding off of sick and disabled people. The same could also apply to recreational, non-violent users. :twocents: