Quote Originally Posted by vegetabongrips
Those were NOT, NOT the only factors which made Westminster Mall determined to be a public entity. There were a SLEW of reasons, those two happen to be the ONLY two reasons in common.

To be completely honest, it's arguable either way. It is definitely not clear cut in either direction, but I'd side with "if it only has 2 out of the 10 reasons, it probably isn't going to meet the same standard." There have been malls across the nation which, including police departments, were found to be private entities. Granted, we're talking about a state supreme court case, but we're also talking about it in reference to a federal right.
"Colorado: A city's financial support of a shopping mall, including its operation of a police substation inside the mall, combined with the range of activities permitted in the mall, made it a latter-day public forum sufficient to trigger the Colorado Constitution's free-speech clause, according to the state's highest court. This clause prevented the owners of the mall from excluding citizens involved in nonviolent political speech. (Bock v. Westminster Mall Co.)"

So like family night for instance?(the event going on the day I was there) or a range of other public events held at the aurora town center?