Results 1 to 10 of 13
Threaded View
-
05-22-2010, 01:58 AM #10
Senior Member
There is legal precedent for completely ignoring 1284 in.....
I think one of the most blatant in this bill is the 5 patient per caregiver, "with special circumstances"--noting that if a patient lives a long distance from a medical marijuana center--the "state" may allow a local caregiver to have more than 5 patients. HOWEVER--this clause alone is in the face of not only the Colorado Constitution--but the U.S. Constitution. The government cannot "dictate" whom a patient chooses to do business with.
I full agree with your above statement. I addressed this earlier and never really got an answer. It basicly says if a patient lives x amount of distance from a mmc that a caregiver can service them even if that care giver has 5 patients already. So, my question was.... what is x distance? 5 miles, 10 miles, 15 miles?
I know every one is talking about someone filing this law suit or that one over dispencaries. But has anyone heard of a lawyer "cory" or anyone that is fighting the 5 patient rule?
Similar Threads
-
Completely Legal Co-Op
By CompletelyLegal in forum Nevada (NV)Replies: 2Last Post: 02-09-2011, 04:18 AM -
ignoring a user?
By copobo in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 2Last Post: 08-06-2010, 08:42 PM -
It's HB 10-1284 - 25-1.5-106 (6)(V)(f) STUPID !
By michaelnights in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 20Last Post: 04-29-2010, 12:56 AM -
Comcast Accused Of Setting Precedent To Scrap Net Neutrality
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-21-2007, 03:56 AM -
Georgia School Lockdown: Creating the Precedent for Martial Law
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 9Last Post: 03-13-2005, 05:48 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online