Results 1 to 10 of 13
Threaded View
-
05-21-2010, 03:07 PM #2
Senior Member
There is legal precedent for completely ignoring 1284 in.....
good point
it *would* make sense for home rule cities to opt-out of 1284 as then the locality could impose and collect all fees, instead of sending it to the state... to basically pay for enforcement in Denver. Why would Fort Collins want their dollars going to Denver for that?Colorado patient grower. :rambohead:
Similar Threads
-
Completely Legal Co-Op
By CompletelyLegal in forum Nevada (NV)Replies: 2Last Post: 02-09-2011, 04:18 AM -
ignoring a user?
By copobo in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 2Last Post: 08-06-2010, 08:42 PM -
It's HB 10-1284 - 25-1.5-106 (6)(V)(f) STUPID !
By michaelnights in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 20Last Post: 04-29-2010, 12:56 AM -
Comcast Accused Of Setting Precedent To Scrap Net Neutrality
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-21-2007, 03:56 AM -
Georgia School Lockdown: Creating the Precedent for Martial Law
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 9Last Post: 03-13-2005, 05:48 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online