Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
1734 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    There is legal precedent for completely ignoring 1284 in.....

    Quote Originally Posted by cowgirl1
    I know every one is talking about someone filing this law suit or that one over dispencaries. But has anyone heard of a lawyer "cory" or anyone that is fighting the 5 patient rule?
    It's Robert Corry. He's one of Colorado's lead PRO- MMJ Lawyers. He speaks at almost every major MMJ gathering, as well as offering free services to many people with MJ charges. I've heard, but not confirmed that he also helped draft Amendment 20. :thumbsup:

    Sorry not sure on the distance needed question.
    Vancefish Reviewed by Vancefish on . There is legal precedent for completely ignoring 1284 in..... Aurora, Commerce City, Denver, Durango, Federal Heights, Ft. Collins, Lafayette, Thornton and Westminister. Certain laws, state and federal, are only selectively enforced in these cities and the county governments are complicit in allowing this. Obviously, certain Colorado communities, make their own rules. They are based on the idea that those who come here and contribute to the community in a positive way are not just tolerated, but encouraged. This frees law enforcement resources for more Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    There is legal precedent for completely ignoring 1284 in.....

    i heard what they did was unconstitutional. anyone who thinks gov isnt corrupt just take a look at mj. they show their true colors then.

    meded is a hell of a drug
    meded, so you can mededicate to mededitate

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    There is legal precedent for completely ignoring 1284 in.....

    It will be challenged in court, which is good. It won't be overturned in total, but we will see individual lawsuits nibble away the more unjust parts until we're left with the bland regulatory bill the dispensary industry needs. I

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Completely Legal Co-Op
    By CompletelyLegal in forum Nevada (NV)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-09-2011, 04:18 AM
  2. ignoring a user?
    By copobo in forum Feedback and Suggestions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-06-2010, 08:42 PM
  3. It's HB 10-1284 - 25-1.5-106 (6)(V)(f) STUPID !
    By michaelnights in forum Colorado (CO)
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-29-2010, 12:56 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-21-2007, 03:56 AM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-13-2005, 05:48 PM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook