Quote Originally Posted by CovertCarpenter
The new setup looks good, mon, tho the others are right that it is a leeeeetle early to tell whether it's a Sativa or Indica, tho I would opine it looks indica-y... Are you working on a new 'label' for it yet?
Haven't come up with one yet, except the name "Dank Bastard". I have to wait though. Even though I know it is a bastard, I don't know if it is dank.

I have been giving a lot of thought to the names people give their strains of cannabis. Seems there needs to be some kind of a naming convention we should follow. Right now the naming seems to be out of whack. I thought this especially true after reading a post about Alaskan Thunder Fuck. Seems the true ATF has been breed into obscurity, but yet people will claim their product to be that. :wtf3:

Also people seem to be complaining around about hybrids that are really not. Also people calling everything under the sun Kush, when they have no idea if it originated in the Kush mountains.

I think some people pick names because they think the name sounds "cool". Others pick a name thinking they know the genetic heritage. Then others pick a name to be deceptive. :gunfighter2:

I have yet to come up with a standard when it comes to naming. With the current state of things, that may be a very hard thing to do, if not imposable.

It would be good to have a naming standard that would faithfully represent the origin and genetics of the product. If this would happen, consumers would have a better idea of what they are really getting, and if it would be of use for their condition. :thumbsup:

Maybe a new thread should be started to discuss this topic.