Thanks again for the information and the video Boaz! :thumbsup:

From watching that video I just realized something that hasn't been explained accurately nor do I think anyone else has noticed this.

Norml stated in their first article "If you notice toward the end of the video you can see what appears to be a small bong on the coffee table." Now the video that they are referring too is the main video that the police used during this raid which is the only video.

In the same article that Norml has posted they included this.. (Columbia Daily-Tribune) "Police discovered a grinder, a pipe and a small amount of marijuana"

Again in the second article that Norml had posted referring to this raid they stated "Police ultimately seized a small amount of marijuana residue and associated paraphernalia"

Then in the video that Boaz posted Mr. O'Reilly says "What did the police find? A small bag of pot.."

So let's recap. The police found a bong according to Norml.

The Columbia Daily-Tribune stated that the police found a grinder, a pipe, and a small amount of Marijuana.

Norml states in their second article in regards to their first one that the police seized a small amount of Marijuana residue and associated paraphernalia.

Last but not least Mr. O'Reilly says that the police found a small bag of pot.

Now is all very so clear that the police found an amount of Marijuana in the families house. These other articles and the media are stating that there was just more then Marijuana correct? I really hope you all see where I'm getting at. Either everyone has only included what they felt was important in their description or maybe the police are trying to make it seem bigger then what it actually is and make the father look more like a druggie. On top of all of that, by doing this unconstitutionally I can see the police trying to add more to the story to get this father in more trouble. Do you all see what I see here?

All I know is if I was that father and anyone else in the family, I would want the story accurately correct because we really don't know if the man had a pipe, bong, grinder or residue just sitting around the house. But none the less I think that the police are trying to make the father look more like a criminal by adding all this extra information to the whole story. What do you think?

I just thought that I would point this out in hope that everyone else realizes this because this whole story is really mixed up if you couldn't tell.