[quote=Zedleppelin]
Quote Originally Posted by Justabloke


So where are all these fires now? My guess is there are over 10,000 people growing in their house now and yet I have not heard of one fire from a grow other than some assclowns trying to make hash with butane. If you listen to the media and the DEA though one would think we're making nuclear weapons. I read one DEA agent telling the media that growers use oxygen tanks to grow bigger plants and they could explode an entire neighborhood, and of course the reporter prints it without checking facts.
We need GOOD reasons to defeat this bill. This is a good and plausible reason with real potential of causing fires. We need ALL the good reasons and not those that have already been beat to death. We need fresh arguments and the potential risk of fire is one of them.

So if we want to lose this one and lose BIG then lets just keep telling them we need our meds (which they already know and don't really care) as our primary argument and watch them whip this bill right on though. TBH, we should not be here debating this point we should be on the phone to all the house members with fresh new arguments of why not to pass this bill. Which we all know will nearly kill MMJ as we now know it in Colorado if enacted and left uncontested. As I said before though, even after this passes (and it will) we still have a gaggle of lawyers who are just itching to file the paperwork for the impending lawsuit when this passes. But, we should do everything we can BEFORE that point so we don't end up waisting MORE money on bad bills that range well into the thousands and thousands of dollars to pay the legislature to come up with stupid bills like Romer's 109 or 1284. When the suit is filed, then money has to be spent on lawyers, court costs, research, submissions/petitions/briefs to the court, evidence gathering/submission, in court time, blah, blah, blah. This ALL costs money and who ends up paying in the end? You, me, and the rest of the tax payers here in the great state of Colorado! We've waisted enough money we don't have on this insipid bill; letâ??s not waist any more money if we can at all avoid it.

So please see my argument for what it is and not for what itâ??s not. It is a GOOD reason NOT to pass this bill, no more; no less. I'm not trying to limit people. In fact, it's been a driving force in my life to fight for "freedom" for all.

This wasnâ??t the debate I expected to have over my post. I thought others would find wording offensive.

Peace, Love, and Hairspray,
j