Yeah... the emails... they proved it was all a scam.

Turns out when i actually researched the story of the emails is looks a bit different.

the ILLEGALLY hacked emails (which part of illegal do you not understa ... oh never mind) showed that a couple scientists didnt want a particular paper to be included in a final report because of their 'flawed' methodology. But the papers WERE included in the final report over the objections of these two guys. This ofc didnt influence the final findings of said report that was put out... what is it 10 years ago or 20.

So basically a couple guys tried to keep a report out of a paper on global warming, a long time ago. They failed. The report was included anyhow. This is what you call 'hiding cooling evidence'?

The email 'scandal' ohhh noooo.... seems to actually prove how the system of peer review works rather than its failure.

And about Al Gore, 'oh no an ex-politician making money off speaking fee's...' thats never happened before.