Results 1 to 10 of 21
Threaded View
-
04-28-2010, 10:20 PM #16
OPMember
It's HB 10-1284 - 25-1.5-106 (6)(V)(f) STUPID !
8 AT THE TIME A PATIENT APPLIES FOR INCLUSION ON THE
9 CONFIDENTIAL REGISTRY, THE PATIENT SHALL INDICATE WHETHER THE
10 PATIENT INTENDS TO CULTIVATE HIS OR HER OWN MEDICAL MARIJUANA,
11 BOTH CULTIVATE HIS OR HER OWN MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND OBTAIN IT
12 FROM EITHER A PRIMARY CAREGIVER OR LICENSED MEDICAL MARIJUANA
13 CENTER, OR INTENDS TO OBTAIN IT FROM EITHER A PRIMARY CAREGIVER
14 OR A LICENSED MEDICAL MARIJUANA CENTER. IF THE PATIENT ELECTS TO
15 USE A LICENSED MEDICAL MARIJUANA CENTER, THE PATIENT SHALL
16 REGISTER THE PRIMARY CENTER HE OR SHE INTENDS TO USE.
Page 57
The important word being SHALL. It is not permissive. It does not use the word MAY.
Patients will NOT be allow to shop around, obtain their green meds at any dispensary of their choice. They can ONLY buy from the dispensary where they are registered with the state.
This subject came up a number of times at the Senate, Local Gov & Energy Committee hearing on 4/28. The provision was not disputed, by Sens Romer, Spence, etc. If it was incorrect, they'd have jumped all over the testimony.
Sen. Romer, at the hearing, seemed to cast blame upon the Governor's office for all these anti-patient "imperfections" in the bill.
Similar Threads
-
Ritter signs 1284/109
By TheReleafCenter in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 6Last Post: 06-08-2010, 01:36 PM -
1284 Passes 49-16
By dedliug in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 12Last Post: 05-12-2010, 02:37 AM -
you can still stop 1284 - if you act RIGHT AWAY
By copobo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 27Last Post: 05-11-2010, 08:47 PM -
The Constitutionality of 1284
By Zedleppelin in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 3Last Post: 05-06-2010, 05:18 PM -
another wuick stupid stupid question
By slipnslide087 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 16Last Post: 02-24-2005, 04:21 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online