Quote Originally Posted by Zedleppelin
Totally agree about Matt Brown, he is and has been nothing more than a lackey for the big dispensaries.

As far as contracting for the dispensaries, I keep hearing this over and over yet everything I read in the bill suggests otherwise, can anyone shed some light on this?

BTW, the co-author of Amendment 20, Warren Edson, has been posting on another forum in support of this bill. :wtf:
it's very simple if this bill stops shops from buying from growers when and how they want/need to thats where becoming part of their shop comes in.it says in the bill that shops will have to supply i think it said somewhere around 70+ % of their own meds.that leaves 30% to the small guy.which is not very much.so in order to deal with the shop more than that you would have to be like a sub of sorts under the shops umbrella.which btw opens you up to all kinds of shit.
palerider7777 Reviewed by palerider7777 on . HB10-1284-So growers......what just happened? I'm hearing a one year statewide moratorium with the caveat that an existing grower must now be affiliated with a dispensary....only one dispensary, whereas, a dispensary can contract with many growers. I'm hearing this from a third party who I consider to be a good source of info. If this is true, it certainly restricts the options of growers. I'm thinking it will also drive down prices, which will in turn, reduce the amount of money that growers are willing to invest in the pricier systems Rating: 5