Too long to edit (come on mods, 10 minutes?) Here is my edit of the post above.

They have to give you a paper that shows proof of why you failed. "Abnormal Characteristics" doesn't suffice. That's bullshit and I'll continue to think it's bullshit until I start seeing some real proof that in Oregon they do whatever the hell they feel like when it comes to drug testing folks. Saying you failed is fine, proving it is quite another story. If you are going to take the time to come here on and continue to post how you failed using products that everyone else has no problems passing with, the onus is us on you to back up your claims. EOS. If labs in Oregon ARE failing folks for synthetic they had better have some "value" or "level" that is out of whack to report, not these ambiguous bullshit reasons.