Wa Supremes To Hear Case

[gypski]

the Washington State Supreme Court is going to hear a case about a fired worker who told during the pre-hire screening that they were an mmj patient. Then fired them when a pre-employment PT game back dirty. But not until later in the year. Can you say discrimination?

Wash. justices to hear case of fired pot patient | KOMO News - Breaking News, Sports, Traffic and Weather - Seattle, Washington | Local & Regional

gypski Reviewed by gypski on 04-02-2010. Wa Supremes To Hear Case the Washington State Supreme Court is going to hear a case about a fired worker who told during the pre-hire screening that they were an mmj patient. Then fired them when a pre-employment PT game back dirty. But not until later in the year. Can you say discrimination? :D Wash. justices to hear case of fired pot patient | KOMO News - Breaking News, Sports, Traffic and Weather - Seattle, Washington | Local & Regional Rating: 5

[killerweed420]

Yep. Just another example of where if you're willing to sacrifice your ethics and cheat on the test you can have a job but if you tell the truth you won't.
I have no problem with playing the game and can cheat any time they want to start the game, because for me its just a game. Its just another shitty job in a long line of shitty jobs and I was looking for a job when I found that shitty job and just move on to the next shitty job.

[jamessr]

the Washington State Supreme Court is going to hear a case about a fired worker who told during the pre-hire screening that they were an mmj patient. Then fired them when a pre-employment PT game back dirty. But not until later in the year. Can you say discrimination?

Wash. justices to hear case of fired pot patient | KOMO News - Breaking News, Sports, Traffic and Weather - Seattle, Washington | Local & Regional

This case is DOA for any positive claim for this patient, we have clear federal court case law about this very issue( another fry case all over again, THCF TEST CASE). This case will on the flip side will also settle the 1 yr expiration date issue by clarifying whether a corp. may interfere in a patients medical treatment, i.e. doc-in-the-boxes non-physician licensed owners/operators through a back door case...no wonder the aclu wants this case heard....donations get action I guess....

Mark my words here and remeber what I said. So when it comes down, we can ponder.

[killerweed420]

Not too concerned about the expiration issue as writing one on an MMJ authorization is pretty much meaningless and holds no legal weight in court unless your medical condition has changed for your, terminal/debilitating disease. But its still always nice to have a legal case set as a presedent to help resolve any later issues.