^ that was my first thought, too, Lead. The California Supreme Court ruled that any limits are illegal, under the laws enacted with Prop 215. But, I would still be cautious if it were me. I would really love to hear from the Californian's on here on how this is actually playing out in the field.

As Lead was saying, over 100 plants could get the feds involved. They used to have mandatary sentencing at the federal level by plant count, but I'm not sure if that is still used today or not. (note: The US Supreme Court ruling against MMJ was for only 6 plants, so they could charge you anyway with much less than 100 plants.)

Which, to me, begs the question . . . If, by State law, there is no limit a person can grow and if the new policy of the fed is to not interfere with State law, then wouldn't all federal limits be null and void in the State? This is one we might see play out in the courts :twocents:

I don't really know a whole lot about all this but I find it all interesting to follow. :smokin: