Quote Originally Posted by KindReviews
I'm right here and that lampshade is another lie from you. Bryan said he would put the Urkel Og up against the strains reviewed. That was his idea!!




We set up an unbiased review board of people we didn't even know and you guys backed out and said you were just going to throw your own. What is that about?
Man, I am WAY to quick to admit that I'm wrong. Here's the original post and quote from CCF:

Originally Posted by KindReviews

An A- for the Urkel-OG says this definitively, KR.com thinks this is above
average in a group of superstars, it stands on its own as an amazing strain
and should be acquired whenever possible. But it also says this, out of our
multi-reviewer team, reviewing on multiple occasions and under differing
circumstances we feel the Afgooey (Delta 9), the Blue Dream (CCH), the Hong
Kong, and the Skunk #1 (HC) all had more consistently strong effects than
did the Urkel-OG. Is that bad? No. Is it true? Yes - for us. We've
reviewed them all this exact same way. We are all in our 30s, we've all
smoked for 15+ years daily, some of us grow, we have different reasons for
getting our cards. If one strain makes all of us say A and another has one
A+, A, A-, A-, B, B it's getting an A- or B+ (and would probably be
re-reviewed just on that question, A- or B+).

Bryan/CCF response:

I would love to take any of those strains mentioned and put them next to the urkle og and see what patients pick!!!!!!!!!!

So, I told you KR, he never was up for this challenge. It was basically your concoction. Like I said, we had questions about your rating system and then you go and create this competition where you stack the deck and pick strains that you know can hang with the Urkle OG!! So, I'm gonna have to say that you're the one who is full of shit my friend!

EDIT: KR, I edited that post because I had second thoughts when you just lied to me!