Quote Originally Posted by lampost
^Cool! Sounds like the bill is becoming more reasonable as it gets tossed around.



This is surprising! I don't understand what this entails... Since we have plant limits, how will this work? Are they saying that between you and your caregiver you can have 6 plants? So maybe they could grow 3 and you could grow 3? I don't really understand what he/she means by this. This would actually make it very hard for them to enforce any kind of plant limits! I don't have a problem with that at all, but it seems kind of odd that they wouldn't realize that...
Right now the bill states that when you sign over your rights to caregiver you are signing over your plants and therefor can't grow ANY for yourself. not keep 2 and your caregiver gets 4..you can't grow ANY. Right now you can sign over your caregiver and still grow your own 6 plants.

The other thing about this bill that bothers me is that the patient limit is still up for there as "any one primary caregiver cannot serve more than 5 patients on the registy at any given time". what does that mean? how will dispensaries get their supply when they have to grow 80% of their own stock and you can't serve more than 5 people????

i read the whole bill last night. it's nothing but contradiction after contradiction. **rolls eyes**

I called about 4 different house representatives of my disproval and reminded them that it was election time.