Quote Originally Posted by rudy2010
andruejaysin many people are asking the same questions and they are legitimate as well.

My problem is with the improbability of the metalic portions of a plane burning, including the engines, but not the bodies inside. This is apparently the case with the plane that hit the Pentagon. You can correct me if I am wrong but I believe the story is that the plane that hit the Pentagon burned so thoroughly that no parts were recovered yet all the bodies in the plane were recovered. Do you have any explanation. Are my facts wrong? Do human bodies burn at a much higher temperature than metal? If you have any possible explanation for this please put it out here.

Maybe you or anyone else can explain the physics of how this is plausible or if my facts on the plane that hit the Pentagon are wrong.
Most metals don't burn at all at any practical temperature. Bodies don't burn terribly well either. Both do however tend to get smashed into very small pieces when they strike concrete at several hundred miles per hour. To say none of the plane was recovered is simply conspiracy theory nonsense. The bodies recovered in anything other than fragments were people who were in the buildings, not the planes. None of this mean the US government didn't exploit the situation to invade Iraq as they had long wanted to do anyway. But if they had planned the attacks they would have framed them directly and not Bin Laden.