Loose Change-911 was an inside job.

[Trip06]

dam this is fake u guys just paranoid

You can try to tell that to the 1,000's of members of the Clean up crew that Testify and have video evidence of the liquid pools of MOLTEN metal still burning 27 days after the collapse under the reckage....DO you under stand what that means? Jet fuel dosnt burn hot enouf to Weaken Steel to a point of collapse. The Original fire of the Planes went out so fast that there are ORIGINAL pictures of PEOPLE standing in the crash hole before the tower went down. All the floors went suddenly cut and the building goes down at free fall speed. So what the fuel pumped it self to every floor of the building and lit itself at the same time and all the floors just magicly broke at the same time....ONLY A FUCKING MORON would beleave the government Story. No PLANE HIT BUILDING 7????

[andruejaysin]

Why do none of you ever stop and think that the things you say don't make sense?

Millions of people saw the planes hit the towers with their own eyes, billions on live TV, soooooo...

Why demolish the buildings after the planes hit them? Do you REALLY think the US wouldn't have gone to war if the buildings had not collapsed?

Why hit the pentagon with a missile? If they can get planes to hit the WTC why couldn't the make one hit the pentagon?

If a plane didn't hit the pentagon what happened to that plane? Why hijack it at all if you're going to launch a missile at the target?

And a few million others.

[bluntar]

911 Eyewitness - Help find the Truth!
This guys voice is freakin awsome.

[rudy2010]

andruejaysin many people are asking the same questions and they are legitimate as well.

My problem is with the improbability of the metalic portions of a plane burning, including the engines, but not the bodies inside. This is apparently the case with the plane that hit the Pentagon. You can correct me if I am wrong but I believe the story is that the plane that hit the Pentagon burned so thoroughly that no parts were recovered yet all the bodies in the plane were recovered. Do you have any explanation. Are my facts wrong? Do human bodies burn at a much higher temperature than metal? If you have any possible explanation for this please put it out here.

Maybe you or anyone else can explain the physics of how this is plausible or if my facts on the plane that hit the Pentagon are wrong.

[andruejaysin]

andruejaysin many people are asking the same questions and they are legitimate as well.

My problem is with the improbability of the metalic portions of a plane burning, including the engines, but not the bodies inside. This is apparently the case with the plane that hit the Pentagon. You can correct me if I am wrong but I believe the story is that the plane that hit the Pentagon burned so thoroughly that no parts were recovered yet all the bodies in the plane were recovered. Do you have any explanation. Are my facts wrong? Do human bodies burn at a much higher temperature than metal? If you have any possible explanation for this please put it out here.

Maybe you or anyone else can explain the physics of how this is plausible or if my facts on the plane that hit the Pentagon are wrong.

Most metals don't burn at all at any practical temperature. Bodies don't burn terribly well either. Both do however tend to get smashed into very small pieces when they strike concrete at several hundred miles per hour. To say none of the plane was recovered is simply conspiracy theory nonsense. The bodies recovered in anything other than fragments were people who were in the buildings, not the planes. None of this mean the US government didn't exploit the situation to invade Iraq as they had long wanted to do anyway. But if they had planned the attacks they would have framed them directly and not Bin Laden.

[rudy2010]

To say none of the plane was recovered is simply conspiracy theory nonsense.

Thanks for the reasonable discussion. I will be happy to be proved wrong on this issue. However I followed some links on this issue from columnists in the main stream media and they pointed to some information that begs for further explanation at the very least.

One of the articles was about the plane that "hit the Pentagon". The experts in the article were told that no pieces of the jet survived the crash except a piece of one engine that was on the ground in front of the wreck. The official word was that all the metal of the plane "burned" and could not be recovered. However the bodies of all the passengers on the plane were recovered. The article also stated that several CIA personell interviewed after the crash indicated that they smelled the distinct smell of the explosive cordite.

It is fine to say the conspiracy theory is nonsense and this was my first opinion as well. Since I read the information available in the main stream media I have a number of questions that no one seems to be able to provide a reasonable explanation of.

Point me to some information not presented directly by the government that refutes this information. Show me the article that says I am wrong. In the mean time I have strong doubts.

There is no logical explanation to say why we would launch a missle. There are a few justifications but that is all theory. How did the actual plane just dissapear if a missle did strike the Pentagon. All this would require the cooperation of numerous agencies and many people and would be almost impossible to conceal. So I am realistic about that. There remains the problems with the Pentagon to be explained and now the nano particles. I am waiting for any reasonable explanation.

:smokin:

[kathaksung]

Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence? .
Monday, 29 November 2010 11:13 Christopher Bollyn .

An organization called the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is calling for the public to demand that the district attorney of New York County investigate and prosecute those responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene. This is from their open letter/petition of June 23, 2010 to the district attorney's office:

Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau

Dear Sirs:

Over the last three weeks you have been informed about the overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center Building 7 was demolished with explosives. I trust that you understand the serious implications of this crime and that you are resolved to prosecute the guilty parties. To provide a critical steppingstone in your investigation, I would like to bring to your attention the widely documented ¨C and widely protested ¨C destruction of physical evidence (structural steel) at the crime scene, which I contend is prosecutable pursuant to Article 205 of the New York Penal Code, ¡ì 205.50 Hindering Prosecution.

In the meantime, I recommend visiting the website of NYC CAN to understand the basis of their appeal for justice and the extent of the criminal destruction of evidence from the World Trade Center:

NYC Coalition For Accountability Now - Join

http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/ter...e-911-evidence

[Trip06]

Why do none of you ever stop and think that the things you say don't make sense?

Millions of people saw the planes hit the towers with their own eyes, billions on live TV, soooooo...

Why demolish the buildings after the planes hit them? Do you REALLY think the US wouldn't have gone to war if the buildings had not collapsed?

Why hit the pentagon with a missile? If they can get planes to hit the WTC why couldn't the make one hit the pentagon?

If a plane didn't hit the pentagon what happened to that plane? Why hijack it at all if you're going to launch a missile at the target?

And a few million others.

Do you think That we woulda went to war in 2 countries over maybe ~100 Us citizens deaths and just a few holes in a building. Comparied to 3,000 and 3 buildings coming down, multiple planes being hijacked, the pentagon being hit, and all that other shit....Yeah......I doubt it. your millions of other questions are FAIL.....compared to Floors FALLING AT FREE FALL SPEED. All three buildings came down As If all the floors were cut simutaniously. NO PLANE HIT WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING 7. Explain that.

[rudy2010]

This guy has another good point. Supposedly the towers collapsed because the metal suddenly reached a temp where it all collapsed. It is still unerving that the towers went down like a demolition but that is just what I saw with my own eyes. There is a big problem explaining how bldg 7 went down with the same clean demolition type collapse but had no fire burning to explain how this was possible. Just another troubling aspect of the governments official explanation.

[BUDEZZ]

Ask ya self this ?? would get 3 terrorist's in the same day flying plane's, and there was a possible 4th!! i dout it very much !! apparantly there was a forth circling a few miles away ?? so four terrorists flying planes in the same day !!!! hmmmmm!!