If Growers were licensed...what then?

[colagal]

The last time I read the house bill, I believe the language was that anyone can grow, but you need to be contracted by a dispensary. If you're under contract, you can serve that dispensary and one other with the remaining 25%. Turning this on it's head, any grower could simply stockpile to reach a level where they produce and sell what the market demands. If you had 100 lbs of the worst outdoor bud you could grow, that enables you to sell up to 25 lbs of anything else. Doesn't make sense.

Do you think that your (all dispensaries for that matter) vendors or growers will voluntarily want to expose themselves through having to obtain dispensary contracts and growers licenses so as to be "legitimate" and distinguish themselves from cartels? I think many growers, even the ones who have enough patients to justify their grow will, like Senorx says, stay hidden if they are smart. So, if many growers do decide to remain anonymous but still want to do business with you, will you be reluctant to do business with them?

colagal Reviewed by colagal on 03-10-2010. If Growers were licensed...what then? Thinking about the changes to the present legislation, there is proposed language, towit: "... the new version would also allow for separate licenses for marijuana- growing facilities tied to dispensaries â?? which could sell a portion of what they grow to other dispensaries â?? and for marijuana product-makers." Read more: Few on either side happy with proposed medical-marijuana licensing rules - The Denver Post What do you suppose the license requirements might entail? Zoning? Rating: 5