Ned will always be it's own town regardless, we are writing a common sense ordinance where dispensary owners, the Marshall, Citizens and trustees are involved in it's creation. We want an alternative to the Denver model that other towns can follow and protect the scene we have here. And everyone agrees up here on the positive effects this has had on our local economy and how it has raised the bar on the quality of medicine being grown.

The Denver model is exactly why they should stay out of this and leave it up to local municipalities, because in theory they (the citizens) know the needs and concerns of their town more then anyone. But it's also easier to fix if a community has regrets later that it has hindered patient access, business and tax revenues. While other towns reap the benefits of being cannabis friendly and having well thought out regulations.:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
GratefulMeds Reviewed by GratefulMeds on . The new Denver Dispensary bill, how worse will it get? I live in Colorado but not Denver, and I was thinking of moving to Denver. As I understand this new bill, is it correct that the Caregivers that grow for over 5 people will have to pay an annual $3000 fee? That is freaking steep, unfair, and greedy on the part of the politicians. I grow for myself and I'm MMJ registered. I've been thinking about seriously becoming a Caregiver and moving to where the market is big...."DENVER", but with the passing of this recent bill, I may alter my plan Rating: 5