Indeed, it's an expensive way of accomplishing something that you can do on the cheap. You can do the same thing with just a jocked bottle of fake pee as Deige suggested for non observed tests.

It almost sounds like a sales pitch for the urinator especially considering the whole: having to raise your shirt above the waist and drop your pants so as to expose your genitals and allow the observer to verify the absence of any cheating devices thing for some directly observed tests.
webdox Reviewed by webdox on . best substitution methed there is (IMHO) i have had anywhere from 12 to 30 employment drug tests a year for over 13 years both pre employ and random even a few post injury tests. i have always used the same thing and never had ANY kind of negative result. i have passed tests where there was someone standing just behind me watching. i don't know how well it would work if they actually needed to see you urinate, but hell this is substitution anyway right. here is my method: on the internet at urinator.com (make sure you spell it with Rating: 5