^ Thank you, everyone for all the kind words and suggestions on this thread.

I agree, read the 23 page report they released that is linked above, :greenthumb: it is a summary of the recent findings and does look very interesting (I admit, I have only skimmed it so far).

MagicDragon, do you have a link to the Cliff Notes' version of that patent desciption, US patent # 6,630,507. :jointsmile: just kidding, that is interesting. I'm no neuro chemical patent attorney or anything but it does looks like a LOT of time and money has gone into trying to secure the patent to this worthless weed with "no medical use", hu?. :detective1: