Results 1 to 10 of 15
Threaded View
-
01-23-2010, 03:10 AM #3
OPSenior Member
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
Well had THCF not sold him the services ONLY QUALIFIED PATIENTS are to receive, then he wouldn't be here on line now would he? That's the part that really sucks for us all as patients, we have a MMJ authorization poser company fucking us patients. Did ya read what Dr. Orvald did in Mr. Fry's pertinent medical documents? What a dumb ass. Of coarse he receives his orders from Mr. Paul Stanford the ceo of THCF whom is not a Dr. of any sorts per law.
This is why I filed a complaint against THCF with many agencies, we will see who protects the public from this harm done by THCF.
Similar Threads
-
Cal Supreme Court Ruling on MMJ - People v. Kelly
By boaz in forum LegalReplies: 10Last Post: 11-09-2010, 02:38 PM -
Why did the Wa. St. Supreme court "use" 3 different defenses in State v. Fry?
By jamessr in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 5Last Post: 06-24-2010, 02:24 AM -
Has the Recent State Supreme Court Ruling Affected You?
By Club420 in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 2Last Post: 02-05-2010, 07:50 AM -
McCain blasts Supreme Court's Guantanamo ruling
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 64Last Post: 06-18-2008, 06:22 AM -
Supreme Court delivers blow to property rights; ruling in Conn. case has Toledo...
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-07-2005, 06:22 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online