Results 11 to 15 of 15
Hybrid View
-
01-24-2010, 05:18 AM #1OPSenior Member
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
Originally Posted by killerweed420
When I worked at THCF, paul told the Dr.'s what to write for all patients, no need for any of the Dr.'s to play lawyer, but they are responsible to know what's legal and not . ESPECIALLY orvald, he is as old as dirt and was a successful heart surgeon before retiring. I was his 3rd patient on his first day after making paul replace dodge. PAUL AND I HAVE AN AXE TO GRIND. I WILL BE BURYING MINE IN HIS ASS.jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on . Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JASON LEE FRY, Petitioner. No. 81210-1 SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON 2010 Wash. LEXIS 64 January 21, 2010. Filed Rating: 5
-
01-24-2010, 07:29 AM #2Senior Member
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
Originally Posted by jamessr
-
01-24-2010, 06:05 PM #3Member
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
Originally Posted by jamessr
Nutcases like you who pursue personal agendas under the thin guise of being a crusader for good are a bigger and more immediate danger to a larger number of people than the THCF (or CannaCare, or any of the others you inexplicably claim to be invalid) could ever be on it's own.
If you ever by some miracle did achieve your stated goal of bringing down all the mmj clinics in WA, you will have left thousands of people in need without having addressed that need in any way. That is reprehensible, and acting like an advocate while doing it makes it even more despicable.
-
01-24-2010, 09:30 PM #4Senior Member
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
Originally Posted by gypski
And thats a rule for everyone to remember. Never rely on your attorney to do all the work. Get copies of everything he files and any depositions he does. There's always mistakes. And one simple mistake can kill you in court.
-
01-24-2010, 09:53 PM #5OPSenior Member
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
Originally Posted by mugenbao
How do you know what the outcome will be without understanding our foundation here in wa. which is shit because of many shitty business practices. Have ya seen the new Wa. Supreme ct. ruling yet? Did ya read it carefully????? If we "all" look at our documents from the clinics( The one's in their possession, not ours), one will see exactly how our legal system will get every patient found guilty that has not seen a regular Dr.... The key here is if every clinic was owned and operated by a LICENSED PHYSICIAN whom understands they need to protect the patient-physician relationship first, we would not have so many people being convicted here in wa.
That's the bottom line, NO SOLID FOUNDATION for us patients. How about instead of saying I am a nut job, ya go out and get signatures for the new initiative so none of us have too worry about any solid foundations anymore.:thumbsup:
P.S. I never ever said cannacare is not a legit business, nor is it a medical clinic either. So I would hope you can sit down smoke a bowl and realize I ain't out too screw any patients. It's too get our providers of our health care in the MMJ industry too better protect us patients, cause caselaw says they are not doing their job we pay them to do.....so now who is harming who now? Think rationally about instead of paranoid delusions of grandeur.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Cal Supreme Court Ruling on MMJ - People v. Kelly
By boaz in forum LegalReplies: 10Last Post: 11-09-2010, 02:38 PM -
Why did the Wa. St. Supreme court "use" 3 different defenses in State v. Fry?
By jamessr in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 5Last Post: 06-24-2010, 02:24 AM -
Has the Recent State Supreme Court Ruling Affected You?
By Club420 in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 2Last Post: 02-05-2010, 07:50 AM -
McCain blasts Supreme Court's Guantanamo ruling
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 64Last Post: 06-18-2008, 06:22 AM -
Supreme Court delivers blow to property rights; ruling in Conn. case has Toledo...
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-07-2005, 06:22 PM