Quote Originally Posted by jamessr
This is just another case in which Paul Stanford head of THCF has screwed another patient out of lots of money for his own personal benefit. We got tracy, soper, barber and now fry with the same old test case crap. THCF needs to be shut down for causing more ACTUAL PUBLIC totality harm then any real good for us patients. Had Dr. Orvald really done his job he owes his patients i.e. physician-patient relationship, fry never would have gotten any authorization for mental health reasons nor would they be mentioned on his documents. Instead Fry's physical conditions would have been documented.

How does THCF offer a service not covered under our MMJ laws? This is called defrauding patients bottom line !!! FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD !!!!!

Gypski, your authorization is completely invalid with this type of ruling going on, just like mine is since the court in my case already ruled if it's not within 1 yr of the original signature date, it is invalid per PAUL STANFORD HEAD CEO..... this is crap if ya ask me gypski. I would look at the other 3 documents behind your authorization which clearly states that 6-12 months is when one should go back and see THCF, they call it a follow-up, it is there gypski since THCF has all 4 pages in their records. Your gonna be one pissed off patient if this same deal happens too you as did Jason Fry.

I know I am and thank god I only had just over an ounce, which in turn I am only being charged for 9.59 grams of it. That POS ceo is hurting patients and needs to come to an end.
As far as I'm concerned, Stanford isn't a doctor. Orvald is the doctor, he explicitly described my condition knowing how hard it is to get a knee replacement without insurance. I have medical records to support this problem long term. Like around 40 years dealing with my knee. I say bring it on, it will only be prejudicial persecution should anything happen. So, I don't need Paul Stanford to tell me how long my authorization is. Under Washington State Law there is no expiration clause, I have a long term painful illness that has been confirmed again by another physician who has seen me before. Let the state become abusers over LEOs fear of job losses which they so surely deserve. It just goes to prove how arcane the laws are, and how ignorant the people have become.
gypski Reviewed by gypski on . Another Set Back Whatever happened to a presumption of innocense? C/P Court: Doc's marijuana OK doesn't preclude search By GENE JOHNSON Associated Press Writer The Washington State Supreme Court says a doctor's permission to use medical marijuana doesn't preclude police from arresting a patient or searching his home. Story Published: Jan 21, 2010 at 10:52 AM PST Rating: 5