Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
1631 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1.     
    #11
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    Mine doesn't state either what the qualifying condition is. But it doesn't really have to and do you want that information on document that may get handed around by police and others? Is it really any of there business what your medical condition is? I say no. Its protected information between you and your doctor. Cops or judges are not medical professionals.

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #12
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    It just occurred to me, that since the esteemed justices say a jury must decide, then request a jury and a PD to handle your case. The majority of the people I know who are medically authorized could not afford to hire and attorney. So, since the justices placed the burden on a jury, request a jury trial and a public defender. Cost them more needless wasteful spending for4 the innocent to prove the are not guilty. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply anymore it seems.

  4.     
    #13
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    Quote Originally Posted by killerweed420
    Mine doesn't state either what the qualifying condition is. But it doesn't really have to and do you want that information on document that may get handed around by police and others? Is it really any of there business what your medical condition is? I say no. Its protected information between you and your doctor. Cops or judges are not medical professionals.
    THCF attached several pages to my authorization that explicitly states what my qualifying condition is. They must be changing their methods since I got mine.

  5.     
    #14
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    This is just another case in which Paul Stanford head of THCF has screwed another patient out of lots of money for his own personal benefit. We got tracy, soper, barber and now fry with the same old test case crap. THCF needs to be shut down for causing more ACTUAL PUBLIC totality harm then any real good for us patients. Had Dr. Orvald really done his job he owes his patients i.e. physician-patient relationship, fry never would have gotten any authorization for mental health reasons nor would they be mentioned on his documents. Instead Fry's physical conditions would have been documented.

    How does THCF offer a service not covered under our MMJ laws? This is called defrauding patients bottom line !!! FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD !!!!!

    Gypski, your authorization is completely invalid with this type of ruling going on, just like mine is since the court in my case already ruled if it's not within 1 yr of the original signature date, it is invalid per PAUL STANFORD HEAD CEO..... this is crap if ya ask me gypski. I would look at the other 3 documents behind your authorization which clearly states that 6-12 months is when one should go back and see THCF, they call it a follow-up, it is there gypski since THCF has all 4 pages in their records. Your gonna be one pissed off patient if this same deal happens too you as did Jason Fry.

    I know I am and thank god I only had just over an ounce, which in turn I am only being charged for 9.59 grams of it. That POS ceo is hurting patients and needs to come to an end.

  6.     
    #15
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    What bothers me about this is that a jury of lay people can decide medical diagnoses? Since when did they get a license to practice medicine?

  7.     
    #16
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    Quote Originally Posted by jamessr
    This is just another case in which Paul Stanford head of THCF has screwed another patient out of lots of money for his own personal benefit. We got tracy, soper, barber and now fry with the same old test case crap. THCF needs to be shut down for causing more ACTUAL PUBLIC totality harm then any real good for us patients. Had Dr. Orvald really done his job he owes his patients i.e. physician-patient relationship, fry never would have gotten any authorization for mental health reasons nor would they be mentioned on his documents. Instead Fry's physical conditions would have been documented.

    How does THCF offer a service not covered under our MMJ laws? This is called defrauding patients bottom line !!! FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD !!!!!

    Gypski, your authorization is completely invalid with this type of ruling going on, just like mine is since the court in my case already ruled if it's not within 1 yr of the original signature date, it is invalid per PAUL STANFORD HEAD CEO..... this is crap if ya ask me gypski. I would look at the other 3 documents behind your authorization which clearly states that 6-12 months is when one should go back and see THCF, they call it a follow-up, it is there gypski since THCF has all 4 pages in their records. Your gonna be one pissed off patient if this same deal happens too you as did Jason Fry.

    I know I am and thank god I only had just over an ounce, which in turn I am only being charged for 9.59 grams of it. That POS ceo is hurting patients and needs to come to an end.
    As far as I'm concerned, Stanford isn't a doctor. Orvald is the doctor, he explicitly described my condition knowing how hard it is to get a knee replacement without insurance. I have medical records to support this problem long term. Like around 40 years dealing with my knee. I say bring it on, it will only be prejudicial persecution should anything happen. So, I don't need Paul Stanford to tell me how long my authorization is. Under Washington State Law there is no expiration clause, I have a long term painful illness that has been confirmed again by another physician who has seen me before. Let the state become abusers over LEOs fear of job losses which they so surely deserve. It just goes to prove how arcane the laws are, and how ignorant the people have become.

  8.     
    #17
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    Quote Originally Posted by WashougalWonder
    What bothers me about this is that a jury of lay people can decide medical diagnoses? Since when did they get a license to practice medicine?
    I said the same thing and I agree. Who the hell are 12 laymen to overrule a licensed physician? Will they have as much education as the defendant since they are supposed to be their peers? Twelve sheep to be lead astray by a vindictive, anti-cannabis attorney dressed in wolf's clothing? Not in my book little Bo Peep. The big, bad wolf can just go straight to hell for being a persecutor not prosecutor. imp:

  9.     
    #18
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    Quote Originally Posted by gypski
    It just occurred to me, that since the esteemed justices say a jury must decide, then request a jury and a PD to handle your case. The majority of the people I know who are medically authorized could not afford to hire and attorney. So, since the justices placed the burden on a jury, request a jury trial and a public defender. Cost them more needless wasteful spending for4 the innocent to prove the are not guilty. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply anymore it seems.
    And this is part of the short term solution. And I don't care what you're charged with. Just ask for an attorney and you want a jury trial. Cost them as much money as you possibly can, drag it out as long as you possibly can. Drain the system till it collapses.

  10.     
    #19
    Member

    Another Set Back

    hello all,

    it is unfortunate that Fry was convicted with poss. of MJ, but if everything was done properly and followed he would not have had that problem. its funny how we point the finger at everyone, but ourselves sometimes. the dr. is not to blame, i see a regular physician and to be honest he has made a few mistakes with paperwork but it is up to me as well to ensure that everything is documented properly, as for a jury well that is a 50/50 chance. some people are just out to screw you over and there is nothing we can do about them, but there judgements are based on the info laid out in front of them not everyone reads and critiques the law like us. lastly to answer everyones question about Anxiety I thought I would pass this one on I received this email a few days ago from DOH.

    The Medical Quality Assurance Commission, in consultation with the Board of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery, made the decision on January 15, 2010, to deny the petition to add bipolar disorder, severe depression and anxiety related disorders, specifically social phobia to the medical conditions for which medical marijuana would be beneficial and that are permitted under state law RCW 69.51A.010(4).

    pls note that this is not to down the cause or to start a debate i just want to input opinion. I can speak from personal experience I have had my home searched with plants going and received no punishment, but i was arrested and tried for another case and the judge wrote in my doc. that I was alwayed to still operate under the medical marijuana law....aka don't do anything stupid we are responsible for our own actions. Fry should continue to fight it because he does as stated earlier have a true illness.:hippy::jointsmile:

  11.     
    #20
    Senior Member

    Another Set Back

    Quote Originally Posted by iforgotmyname
    hello all,

    it is unfortunate that Fry was convicted with poss. of MJ, but if everything was done properly and followed he would not have had that problem. its funny how we point the finger at everyone, but ourselves sometimes. the dr. is not to blame, i see a regular physician and to be honest he has made a few mistakes with paperwork but it is up to me as well to ensure that everything is documented properly, as for a jury well that is a 50/50 chance. some people are just out to screw you over and there is nothing we can do about them, but there judgements are based on the info laid out in front of them not everyone reads and critiques the law like us. lastly to answer everyones question about Anxiety I thought I would pass this one on I received this email a few days ago from DOH.

    The Medical Quality Assurance Commission, in consultation with the Board of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery, made the decision on January 15, 2010, to deny the petition to add bipolar disorder, severe depression and anxiety related disorders, specifically social phobia to the medical conditions for which medical marijuana would be beneficial and that are permitted under state law RCW 69.51A.010(4).

    pls note that this is not to down the cause or to start a debate i just want to input opinion. I can speak from personal experience I have had my home searched with plants going and received no punishment, but i was arrested and tried for another case and the judge wrote in my doc. that I was alwayed to still operate under the medical marijuana law....aka don't do anything stupid we are responsible for our own actions. Fry should continue to fight it because he does as stated earlier have a true illness.:hippy::jointsmile:
    Sorry but,

    The court noted specifically WHY Mr. Fry was convicted. HIS MEDICAL RECORDS WERE FLAWED by Dr. Orvald. Paul Stanford has a proven history as a business owner to tell his CONTRACTED Dr.'s what to write and what not to write for TEST CASE PURPOSES ONLY. No skin off his ass, just ours as patients, since his position is not part of the MMJ laws. Also since no Dr. can be convicted or any charges for the authorization written fucked up.

    I have a case before the courts with THCF Dr. Orvald which I was sold a service for life according to mr. THCF ceo and dr. orvald both. This scum bucket stanford wrote a declaration stating the service he sold me was only valid for 1 yr....4 yrs later because we went after(filed suit) the state for stealing our meds and equipment knowing we was patients, they even put in the LEO reports that I am a verified patient.

    The court ruled I have no defense since ceo scum said so. WTF? Orvald has not said jack shit yet or written shit about whether my 04' authorization is valid or not. GAME PLAYING BITCHES need their asses stompt out.


    Gypski,

    I hope you show up at my trial just too see this crap happening so you can game plan against them when it's your turn to face these fucks. I would do it if it was me, as a matter of fact I would be happy to be a witness in your case if you asked me too. ya got my email, I suggest ya use it.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-13-2010, 10:19 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook