As noted by Palerider's references, these "bargaining chips" are so restrictive and unrealistic that it is choking the life out of the initial amendment passed by the voters.

If I understand these proposals correctly, what can a patient do if, for example, they were unsatisfied with the meds provided by the caregiver, or the patient is unhappy with their caregiver's caregiving, or the caregiver's crop was compromised in some fashion and not productive, or if the patient wants to change their caregiver? The patient cannot grow as a back up, and the patient cannot go to another caregiver/dispensary since that would constitute the primary caregiver delegating to or joining with another caregiver. What does that leave? The bad ol' days...

The legislators want this as restrictive as possible giving more ammo for LEO to step in the fray. Maybe I have misinterpreted and am doing a Chicken Little dance for no reason...
colagal Reviewed by colagal on . the devil's details Still trying to get a grasp on the growing/cultivating details and how it fits into the regulatory proposals....according to the definitions in the proposed Denver City ordinance to be considered at a public hearing on Jan 11: "Medical Marijuana dispensary means a business that sells or otherwise distributes marijuana through one or more primary care-givers to six (6) or more patients for medical use, along with any cultivation of marijuana associated with such sale or distribution. The term Rating: 5