I would have to say the patients would have to call them both into court as expert witnesses. One hostile (non-signer) as affirmative defense foundation. Simple.

Gypski,

I have some medical case law which states that it is the "SPECIALIST" expert witness which supersedes the non-specialist expert witness. Most non doc in the box Dr.'s do not have the scientific info or specialty of MMJ and it's risks and benefits. This could/may be a problem depending on the judge wieghing the evidence and applying the rules of such. Of coarse the court of appeals may clarify this since the act is specific. Our appeal courts have just recently started to interpret the act as it was meant to be. If it ain't in the act, it don't exist:wtf::wtf::wtf:....ambiguous vs. unambiguous.:thumbsup:.....telling the executive branch BULLSHIT !!!
jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on . Loop Hole? Say your get your authorization from a doc in the box who specializes in mmj authorizations with patients with a valid medical history and they put an expiration on your authorization (not in the law, they don't expire). What if you then go to your regular doctor, who wouldn't sign around the time your expiration date is coming on your doc in the box authorization, and the regular doc finds your conditions are still the same, you can carry on without fear from LEO because expiration's aren't Rating: 5