I would have to say the patients would have to call them both into court as expert witnesses. One hostile (non-signer) as affirmative defense foundation. Simple.

Gypski,

I have some medical case law which states that it is the "SPECIALIST" expert witness which supersedes the non-specialist expert witness. Most non doc in the box Dr.'s do not have the scientific info or specialty of MMJ and it's risks and benefits. This could/may be a problem depending on the judge wieghing the evidence and applying the rules of such. Of coarse the court of appeals may clarify this since the act is specific. Our appeal courts have just recently started to interpret the act as it was meant to be. If it ain't in the act, it don't exist:wtf::wtf::wtf:....ambiguous vs. unambiguous.:thumbsup:.....telling the executive branch BULLSHIT !!!