Yes gypski that is true. But when you have a state prosecutor claiming NO AUTHORIZATION IS FOR LIFE, it becomes a cluster fuck free for all. It becomes a real DOG FIGHT with shit hitting the fan every direction. A patient has a hard time wading through the DOG SHIT and it's smell.

It all boils down too the FINACIAL INTEREST of the doctor and non-physician owner/operator fee splitting scam. Not to mention the states interest in prosecuting patients the doc in the box owners/operators feeding patients to the state on a constant basis, depending on what part of the law the state wishes to challenge. The state gets what is known as a quid-pro-quo, a declaration of guilt from the non-physician owner/operator, not the signing physician under RCW 18.71 or 18.57.

A court will take the quid-pro-quo because unless the corp. officer, director or CEO committs some sort of illegal act which can be proven, the patient is at a huge disadvantage with claiming an aff. def......the DR. gets hidden behind the CEO's professional business opinion. This is a huge issue for all us patients as a whole. A true unethical violation we are subjected too by this, from all the professionals involved combined.
jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on . Loop Hole? Say your get your authorization from a doc in the box who specializes in mmj authorizations with patients with a valid medical history and they put an expiration on your authorization (not in the law, they don't expire). What if you then go to your regular doctor, who wouldn't sign around the time your expiration date is coming on your doc in the box authorization, and the regular doc finds your conditions are still the same, you can carry on without fear from LEO because expiration's aren't Rating: 5